Disease as the Language of the Soul
| |

|
Ruediger Dahlke, M.D., member of the
HN Editorial Board The Spiritual
Companion, is one of the most popular and
respected psychotherapists in Germany. He is author
and co-author of many best-selling books and the
main exponent of spiritually oriented
psychosomatics in psychotherapy. |
Case study
by
Ruediger Dahlke M.D.
THE SPIRITUAL
COMPANION
Be not afraid of Life. Believe that Life is
worth living and your
Belief will help create the Facts.
William James
In our society, disease is not considered to be
a language, or a pathway, or even to have any form of
sense. It is not recognised as being something central to
our existence, but is rather seen to be an abundance of
objectionable, more or less coincidental setbacks in
life. For this reason we find it normal to refer to
"diseases" in the plural, although this in itself makes
no more sense than to refer to "healths". In contrast,
the majority of major religions and their esoteric
traditions always consider disease to be a fundamental
part of our being.
According to the Creation stories, man has been
incomplete ever since one side of him was removed in Paradise.
Since that time, we have been continually on the lookout for
what is popularly known as our "better half". The Christian
religion promises that we will return to the spiritual unity
and completeness of Paradise. The Saviour showed us the way
back to wholeness/holiness, symbolised by Paradise, the
Heavenly Kingdom of God, which Christ said was to be found in
each of us. Completeness, and as a result complete health are
only possible in that realm, that is to say, on the other side
of this polar world of opposites.
Astonishingly, this corresponds to the view of the World Health
Organisation (WHO), which defines health as a condition free of
physical, mental and social suffering. According to this
definition, healthy people may be found in the pages of anatomy
books, but certainly not in our modern world. This belief,
which is the natural world-view of the esoteric tradition, is
confirmed by practitioners of orthodox medicine and natural
healing – albeit with gritted teeth. Mankind is ill. The health
statistics are in fact statistics showing the incidence of
disease, and state for example that in 25 years, an average
citizen will suffer 2 life-threatening, 20 serious and another
200 moderate to mild ailments. With their increasingly
sophisticated diagnostic methods, practitioners of orthodox
medicine cannot find anybody today who is completely healthy.
If 1000 supposedly healthy people are surveyed, practically
none of them are able to say that they are totally free of any
medical complaint. Natural healers, with their even more
sensitive diagnostic methods, have problems to find anyone with
a completely normal liver, let alone anyone in perfect health.
The conclusion is surprisingly obvious, and all schools of
thought are in agreement: mankind is ill. Regardless of whether
or not we share the hope of medicine that all disease will at
some point be wiped out; at the moment, perfect health is not a
thing of this world. It is possible to oppose this fact
aggressively as in the case of orthodox and natural medicine,
or to accept it like the religious and esoteric traditions; in
any case, illness has become one of mankind’s tasks.
The aggressive approach [1] of the medical
practitioner is to form an alliance with the patient against
the symptom and to try to eliminate it as quickly as possible.
The esoteric approach, which I intend to describe here, is
quite the opposite: the doctor allies himself with the symptom
and tries to find out what the patient lacks which could be
causing it. Meaning is apportioned to the symptoms as they are
interpreted.
This is in fact no unusual step and is widespread in normal
life. We are accustomed to giving a meaning to everything
possible, and are even put out if we fail to do so. Let us
assume that someone gives us the following answer to our
question about the latest play: the stage measured four by six
metres and was two metres high, there were eight actors, two of
whom were men and six women, their costumes were made of x
metres of silk and y metres of linen, the stage was lit by so
many lux, etc. We would be fairly indignant, because we had in
fact been expecting an interpretation of the contents of the
play, and not a description of the external formal details.
Something which seems so obvious to us in the theatre is no
longer so when it comes to medicine. When a patient goes back
to the internist three days after the initial examination, he
is told that his blood and urine tests gave such and such a
value, his blood pressure was x and his temperature was y. A
shadow was visible in the X-ray picture and the ECG gave the
following result. Astonishingly, in this situation the patient
is not indignant, but accords the doctor and his scientific
methods all respect, although also here the concern is with
form rather than with content. Only when the internist
interprets all the results and pronounces the words the patient
has been waiting for, "This indicates that you have pneumonia",
does the whole process begin to have any sense. However, the
question is, why should we stop at this point, just when it
begins to get interesting for the patient?
It would of course be possible to examine what inflammation and
the lungs signify. It is obvious that the lungs are governed by
the principle of contact and communication; they are after all
responsible for the exchange of gases and for our speech, which
relies on the modulations of the stream of air we exhale.
Inflammation, on the other hand, is an expression of conflict.
Pathogenic organisms fight against our antibodies, and the
means they use is clearly aggressive: they besiege, attack,
block and kill. The macrophages (literally translated as "great
eaters") give just as little quarter as the antibodies, which
hurl themselves in kamikaze fashion onto the pathogens and
perish alongside them. All this would indicate that pneumonia
reflects conflict in the area of communication. The frequent
incidence of pneumonia in intensive care units is proof of
this. It cannot primarily be caused by pathogens, because there
are fewer to be found here than anywhere else. However, when
the only remaining form of contact to the world is via a couple
of plastic tubes, many people develop a contact problem, which
for lack of other forms of expression can be physically
manifested in the form of pneumonia.
Esoteric medicine assumes that all physical events are the
expression of a hidden psychological agenda. If we cover up the
physical manifestation, we only succeed in strengthening the
psychological problem. Alleviating a symptom just has the
effect of pushing it to one side, into the subconscious or the
"shadows". This type of symptom displacement would not be
thinkable in other areas, for example in technology. If the
alarm signal on a machine lit up, we would not dream of
unscrewing the bulb in order to have some peace. However, in
the case of headaches or other pain, we think nothing of
blocking the warning signal by taking painkillers. To put it
bluntly, if this system is followed, the symptom will be sent
from organ to organ and the patient from specialist to
specialist.
Thanks to physics, we have known for a long time that in
principle, nothing can be created: matter and energy can only
be transformed from one form to another. From this, it is
obvious that our approach can only displace symptoms rather
than eliminating them. However, a vertical displacement, that
is to say from the physical to the spiritual level, has much
more chance of achieving healing than one which is restricted
to the physical plane.
Symptoms arise when the person affected refuses to deal with an
issue on a conscious level: the problem then sinks to the level
of the physical body and materialises there. If s/he wants to
solve this problem, there is little sense in suppressing its
physical manifestation by chemical (e.g. cortisone) or mental
means (e.g. affirmations, behavioural therapy). On the
contrary, it is necessary to become aware of the problem lying
behind the physical symptoms. Once it has again been brought to
light, there is at least a chance of solving it. Furthermore,
the body would be relieved of its need to depict the problem
symptomatically. The body is in fact merely an alternative
stage for our conscious being. If we refuse to permit a play to
be played out in our consciousness, it will materialise on the
physical stage.
From this it is clear that disease is another way in which we
can learn. However, it is significantly more elegant and
purposeful ¾ although admittedly not more pleasant ¾ to learn
directly by means of our conscious being without having to
present the issue on our alternative physical stage first. In
this way we have the chance of genuine prevention. Today, for
example, we sometimes speak of cancer prophylaxis, although we
really mean early recognition. Naturally it is much better to
become aware of a problem early rather than late, but this has
nothing at all to do with prevention. Genuine prophylaxis means
making physical symptoms unnecessary by voluntarily working
through the issue on a spiritual level.
Anyone who understands disease as the language of the soul
experiences first-hand in his or her own body that form and
content always belong together, or, as Goethe expressed it:
everything which is transitory is allegorical. Disease is the
formal aspect of a spiritual content; or in other words,
symptoms are the physical embodiment of spiritual issues.
Symptoms are in fact merely a special type of body language,
which is certainly the most widespread means of communication
on earth. However, although it is the most universal language,
it is only consciously understood by a few people in our
culture. Nevertheless, it would not be so difficult to learn it
again, because not only do our bodies speak, we also use
physical metaphors in our speech. Whether we grasp something or
understand it, whether some things get on our nerves and others
go to our heads, whether we take something to heart or feel it
to be a blow, whether shivers run down our spine or something
takes our breath away, the language is always psychosomatic and
shows a connection between soul and body which our society is
slowly rediscovering.
Further to our body language, which is expressed in the simple
description of symptoms and which is augmented by colloquial
expressions, proverbs and images, the findings of orthodox
medicine are also available to help us interpret our symptoms.
Indeed the formal description of the disease process is by no
means wrong or even just superfluous. It would not be possible
to follow a play if there were no stage, without lighting
everything would be dark, and without costumes the play would
be far less expressive - it would possibly even be
embarrassing. Likewise, this esoteric approach is not directed
against the medical establishment; it is rather meant to
complement it. Therefore it is unnecessary to take a stand
against orthodox medicine. It is almost exclusively occupied
with the physical body, but is incomparably good at "repair
work" on this level. Anyone who complains that medical
practitioners do not concern themselves with the whole person
can be compared to a visitor to the town swimming baths who
complains that there is no view of the sea ¾ although a view of
the sea was not promised, and the visitor is free to travel to
the seaside at any time. Anyone who wishes to be healed should
look for a holistic type of treatment which doesn’t devalue
orthodox medicine, but goes far beyond it.
The symptoms experienced and the results obtained should be
accorded equal significance and should be pieced together
little by little to form a complete picture of the disease and
its causes. The area or organ affected shows where the problem
is to be found; in the case of pneumonia in the area of contact
and communication. The specific event throws light on the type
of problem; in the case of pneumonia the problem is
conflict.
The following questions have been shown to be helpful when
making a diagnosis: why is this happening to me at this time?
What does the symptom stop me from doing? What does it force me
to do? What sense does it have in my life at this time?
Of course, every combination of symptoms is unique and can only
be interpreted meaningfully when the individual situation is
taken into account. This is especially important with diseases
which have a radical effect on the body such as AIDS or cancer.
A diagnosis only becomes completely exhaustive if the personal
circumstances are taken into consideration as well as the
organs affected.
[1] The aggressive "anti-view" of
orthodox medicine is shown even in the description of the
arsenal of weapons which it uses to conquer the symptoms:
anticonvulsants, anticoagulants, antibiotics,
antipyretics and antihistamines. Anything which isn´t
"anti" often turns out to be a blocker (acid blockers and
beta blockers) or at least an inhibitor (ACE
inhibitors).
Translation by Heather Vaughan
Contentwise responsibility and to the
establishment of
contact:
Ruediger Dahlke
M.D.
c/o Heil-Kunde-Institut Dahlke GmbH & Co.
KEG
Oberberg 92
8151 Hitzendorf -
Austria
Ph. 0043 - 316 - 719
88 85
Fax: 0043 - 316 - 719 88
86 visit
www.dahlke.at
Email: info@dahlke.at
|
#
|
PS: Click on the flags
of www.dahlke.at to read the homepage in
your language.
|
»
Books by Ruediger Dahlke «
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|